Play Hamlet vs. Mel Gibson’s movie version Essay

Performance Analysis of Shakespeares The cataclysm of village, Prince of Denmark My public presentation analysis is based on Shakespeares The Tragedy of village, Prince of Denmark. This drudgery was directed by Franco Zeffirelli and starred Mel Gibson, Glenn weedy, Alan Bates, and Paul Scofield. In this production of small town, the original old English is used. However, I noticed that any duologue that was too difficult to comprehend or too wordy was deleted from the scenes. around of the scenes had also been altered. For example, In Act 2, Scene 1, the conductor has Polonius spy on Ophelia and critical point, and this is how he learns of Hamlets strange visit with his daughter and Hamlets nauseousness. In the original text of Act 2, scene 1, Ophelia informs Polonius of Hamlets visit and his apparent madness. I believe the director chose to generate Polonius spy on them to obtain this information, because the audience would observe for themselves just how mad Hamlet appe ars. It was also probably done to save time so that the movie wouldnt drag. In Kenneth Branaughs version the movie is contained on two tapes, and his version was a little too slow abject for my taste.The lines 207-0 213 in Act 2, scene2, where Polonius has a lengthy monologue, also appears to have been carving from the script. In that same act the lines where Guildenstern and Rosencranz enter the scene have been locomote to Act 3, Scene 1, a point directly after Hamlets Mousetrap play. There were also several other modifications to the stance of scenes in this play, including Shakespeares famous speech, To be or not to be , which had been moved to Act 1, scene 2. I believe all of these changes were do due to the advantageous nature of the film media. It was possible for the director to level several shots of different actors and events, transmutation back and forth between scenes. This gave the nub of the scenes occurring simultaneously. Since these scenes appeared to have o ccurred at the same time in the movie, it probably do sense or seemed more effective to the director to move the scenes or acts around to what seemed the most logical point in the film.As a result of these modifications, I felt this version of Hamlet was more fast and engaging. It did not drag. I appreciated this production over the other Hamlet films I have seen, because it was made more interesting through directors shifting camera technique. The setting and costumes of this play were also historically accurate for that time period. And the lighting was well done -not too dark. As far as the actors go, Mel Gibson gave an energetic interpretation of the melancholy Hamlet and Glenn Close was so intense and very believable as Gertrude, Hamlets mother. The other actors also performed their parts very well. In summary, I enjoyed this performance more than Kenneth Branaughs production, because I felt it was faster paced and more dynamic. I face this effect was achieved through th e directors technique of shifting the camera between the actors and scenes to give the impression that events were occurring simultaneously. I also feel Mel Gibsons energetic performance and Glenn Closes intense and vivid performance added a dynamic quality, which I have not seen in any other production of this play.